Powerful analytics for your sales documents. See what works and what doesn't with engagement heatmaps and page-by-page insights.
While Qwilr excels at creating beautiful, interactive web-based proposals, DocBeacon takes a different approach by focusing on what matters most to sales teams: understanding how prospects engage with your content. Our platform provides deep analytics for traditional document formats that most businesses already use, without requiring you to rebuild your entire sales process.
Unlike Qwilr's focus on web page proposals, DocBeacon provides deep analytics for traditional documents, helping you understand engagement at a granular level.
No need to rebuild your sales collateral. DocBeacon works with the PDFs and documents you already use, adding a powerful layer of analytics on top.
Get the analytics you need without paying for complex design features. DocBeacon is a cost-effective solution for teams focused on performance.
"Switched from Qwilr to DocBeacon and saw immediate results. Our existing PDF proposals now provide insights we never had before."
"DocBeacon's analytics helped us identify which sections of our proposals clients found most valuable, leading to better win rates."
While both platforms serve the proposal and document sharing market, they take fundamentally different approaches. Here's how DocBeacon and Qwilr compare across key areas that matter most to sales teams.
| Feature | DocBeacon | Qwilr | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
Document Engagement Heatmaps Visual representation of reader attention | Basic | DocBeacon provides page-level heatmaps for PDFs. Learn more about advanced document analytics solutions. | |
Reading Time Analytics Time spent on each page/section | Both platforms track viewing duration | ||
Content Optimization Insights AI-powered content recommendations | DocBeacon suggests content improvements based on engagement data. Discover modern proposal tracking software features. |
| Feature | DocBeacon | Qwilr | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
PDF Document Support Native PDF analytics and tracking | Qwilr focuses on web-based proposals only | ||
Interactive Web Proposals Beautiful, web-based proposal creation | Qwilr's core strength is interactive proposal design | ||
Template Library Pre-built proposal templates | Basic | Qwilr offers extensive design templates |
| Feature | DocBeacon | Qwilr | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
Built-in Contact Management Contact and deal management | DocBeacon includes contact management functionality | ||
Lead Scoring Automatic lead qualification based on engagement | Limited | DocBeacon scores leads based on document engagement | |
Contact Management Integrations Connect with existing contact management systems | Both platforms offer contact management integrations |
While Qwilr excels at creating beautiful, web-based proposals, DocBeacon focuses on providing deep, actionable analytics for traditional document formats like PDFs. Our heatmaps show you exactly which sections of your document are most engaging.
Yes, and with more detail. DocBeacon provides page-by-page analytics, time spent on each page, and engagement scores, giving you a more granular view of recipient interest than Qwilr.
DocBeacon's pricing is designed to be accessible for teams of all sizes and is often more competitive than Qwilr, especially for users who need powerful analytics without the cost of advanced design features.
Stop guessing and start measuring. Switch to DocBeacon for powerful analytics on your existing sales documents and close deals faster.