Qwilr Alternative
Powerful analytics for your sales documents. See what works and what doesn't with engagement heatmaps and page-by-page insights.
Why Choose DocBeacon Over Qwilr
Granular Document Analytics
Unlike Qwilr's focus on web page proposals, DocBeacon provides deep analytics for traditional documents, helping you understand engagement at a granular level.
Works with Your Existing Files
No need to rebuild your sales collateral. DocBeacon works with the PDFs and documents you already use, adding a powerful layer of analytics on top.
Affordable and Scalable
Get the analytics you need without paying for complex design features. DocBeacon is a cost-effective solution for teams focused on performance.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | DocBeacon | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| PDF & Document Analytics | ||
| Engagement Heatmaps | Limited | |
| Interactive Web Proposals | ||
| Built-in CRM | ||
| Cost-Effective Pricing | Higher Tier |
Frequently Asked Questions
How does DocBeacon compare to Qwilr's interactive pages?
While Qwilr excels at creating beautiful, web-based proposals, DocBeacon focuses on providing deep, actionable analytics for traditional document formats like PDFs. Our heatmaps show you exactly which sections of your document are most engaging.
Can I track engagement on my sales proposals like in Qwilr?
Yes, and with more detail. DocBeacon provides page-by-page analytics, time spent on each page, and engagement scores, giving you a more granular view of recipient interest than Qwilr.
Is DocBeacon a more cost-effective option than Qwilr?
DocBeacon's pricing is designed to be accessible for teams of all sizes and is often more competitive than Qwilr, especially for users who need powerful analytics without the cost of advanced design features.
Focus on What Works
Stop guessing and start measuring. Switch to DocBeacon for powerful analytics on your existing sales documents and close deals faster.