Go beyond form‑fills and downloads. Score prospects by what they actually read, revisit, share, and act on.
Scoring should reflect your real funnel stages rather than generic thresholds. If demos require a business case, give stronger weight to sections about ROI and implementation. If trials are self‑service, weight product sections and in‑doc CTA clicks higher. Revisit rates across pricing FAQs and security pages are powerful signals for B2B buyers who involve legal and IT.
Build a set of score‑based actions that are easy to operate: auto‑create tasks in CRM when the score passes your MQL threshold, send a dynamic email that references the sections the reader spent time on, and surface a “Next Best Action” card in your SDR workspace with talk tracks tied to reading behavior.
Respect reader privacy while measuring engagement. Use transparent consent language, honor opt‑outs, and avoid invasive tracking. Engagement scoring should serve relevance, not surveillance. Keep retention windows reasonable and document your data flows so marketing and legal stay aligned.
Yes. Reading time, section completion, revisits, internal forwarding, and CTA clicks are the primary signals. Download‑only behavior and very short sessions should score low. Reference the specific sections they explored in outreach to demonstrate relevance.
Yes. Export or push via API into CRM/automation to inform MQL/SQL thresholds and routing. Use score bands to trigger different playbooks—SDR call, AE demo invite, or nurture track with educational content.
Sections that reduce risk (security, compliance), clarify value (ROI case studies), and show proof (customer results) typically drive revisits and multi‑stakeholder views. Make these sections precise and easy to navigate.
Define actions per score band. For example, score ≥ 60: auto‑create an AE task with a tailored email referencing the reader’s sections; score 40–59: SDR call with a resource bundle; score ≤ 39: enroll in nurture with content aligned to skims.
Whitepapers, technical reports, and buyer guides should be more than lead magnets—they should be signal generators. Treat each section as a hypothesis about what convinces buyers, then update language based on real reading behavior. Use chapter‑level CTAs, internal links to deeper resources, and post‑read emails that mirror the reader’s interests.
Over time, your team will learn which narratives consistently produce demos and which produce skims. Refactor content to bring high‑intent sections earlier, clarify complex paragraphs, and add proof where readers hesitate. The result is a repeatable content engine that not only attracts leads but converts them.
Full reads vs. skims vs. repeated views of key sections reveal intent.
Multiple sessions and internal shares are strong buying signals.
In‑doc CTA clicks and downstream behavior feed into scoring.
Use engagement‑based scoring to surface the next best prospects.